Comparison of roulette, poker and insurance


There are many various types of betting, most of them have one thing in common - you bet a rather small amount of money and there is a very small chance that you will win a lot of money. Why are there no lottery tickets for $1 where you would have 50% chance for winning $1.90? Or 80% chance for winning $1.10? I guess people just wouldn’t buy them. But why do people buy tickets for $1 where they have 1 in a million chance for winning $100 000? I can not think of any other reason than that they are stupid.

Comparison:
Insurance - you pay just little money and if something highly unprobable happens you can get a lot of money
Lottery - you pay just little money and if something highly unprobable happens you can get a lot of money
Roulette - you choose how much you want to risk, but you will lose on average 1/37 of what you bet
Poker - depends mainly on your knowledge of statistics and psychology compared to your opponents’, you choose how much you want to risk
Betting with friends - has the best positive expectation if you have the right friends and know how to do it, reminds me of a former classmate who lost every single bet he has made (he thought he’d write a 500 page book, run faster than marathon winners, and so on…)
Post edit: Stowawaying is another type - you have a very high percentage to win a very small amount and a very small percentage to lose quite a huge amount.
As a side note, I face the same problem over and over when writing to the blog - I have a lot of very good ideas (at least I think so), but I am too lazy to put them in proper order (I just write what I think of, the order is more or less random) and generally play with it a bit, I just write it all down and publish it. Otoh this has the advantage that it forces you to find out the connections yourself, so maybe that would be a good excuse for my laziness. :-)

Posted on 2006-04-14 at 9:09 pm, filed under random thoughts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Responses to “Comparison of roulette, poker and insurance”

  1. Keo says:

    Jestli chceš sázet s kurzem třeba 1,5, tak na sport. Nikdo ti nebrání vsadit na jeden zápas. Pravda ale je, že většina lidí vsází na víc.

  2. Drc says:

    No, myslim, že tě studium ekonomie bude bavit… Dělej do pojišťovnictví tam použiješ stejné znalosti psychologie a statistiky jako v pokru…

    Obecně platí: malé riziko -> malý zisk (a naopak) a stejně tak malá likvidita -> velký zisk - to je jenom pro případ, že by ses příště vrhl na kapitálové trhy… (Tam se dá taky fakt hodně a docela rychle získat, akorát je to o hodně náročnější…)

Leave a Reply

Because this post is too old and I'm getting a lot of spam on old posts, only registered users can post a comment here.