We don't need no educashion
No, not another Pink Floyd post…
It happened that I changed schools again. Faculty of business management at vutbr was real crap (so crap I’m not even giving them a link). Easily the worst school I’ve ever seen. While I think that educashion is very important, I’m not a fan of schooling. One can educate (or should that be “educash”?) oneself watching google’s educashional videos (thanks to keo for pointing it out), reading books (some of which are even available online, like SICP), or listening to podcasts (I’m not really into that, though).
Currently, I study cca 8 hours a day and I’m learning a lot. Although it consists mostly of selfstudy, if I face a hard problem that I can’t solve or just get stuck, there are teachers to help me. Also, there’s free water and they even pay me money for studying there. All in all, can’t complain.
5 thoughts on “We don't need no educashion”
sheeryjay 2007-12-15
Refreshing point of looking at it, thanks for reminding me :).
Btw, I think you actually can’t say that you don’t need no education as you’ve just used double negative :P (maybe funny pun on song? :) ).
tasuki 2007-12-15
I thought someone might point out that “educashion” is wrong spelling. It’s even wrong spelling of the “official wrong spelling”, which is “educashun”… :P
Ok, back to the point – double negative in this context underlines rebeliousness of the statement. I think that you can’t really blame Roger Waters for that.
rainy 2007-12-15
I was going to point this out tasuki, but then I thought edu-cash-ion is kind of my “dancerous”, and decided to leave it…. for Merlijn ;))
sheeryjay 2007-12-15
Haha, sorry I didn’t even notice educashion, it was too subtle for me to notice ;). After all, I am just a stupid geek pretending to be clever :P.
tasuki 2007-12-15
“Dancerous” wins hands down :)
Add your comment — How does this work?